restructure: proper project layout, README, kill training

- cuda/ — main LBM kernel (khra_gixx_1024_v5.cu)
- navigator/ — lattice_observer, golden_weave, bridges, mock daemon
- scripts/ — compile, start, launch, setup (paths updated)
- docs/ — system manual
- archive/ — everything else (old kernels, inquiries, experiments)
- README.md — full setup guide: requirements, quick start, use your own LLM
- removed training/ entirely (broken LoRA scripts + datasets)
- .gitignore: exclude build/ logs/ training/ *.jsonl

archive/inquiries/golden_ratio_questions.py

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+# golden_ratio_questions.py
+# Golden Ratio and Exponential Envelope
+
+import requests
+
+print("="*70)
+print("GOLDEN RATIO AND EXPONENTIAL ENVELOPE")
+print("="*70)
+
+system_prompt = (
+    'ROLE: Deep-Field Explorer (Lattice Environment)\n'
+    'PRIMARY DIRECTIVE: Map the unknown territory of the 1024-grid for the Reality Study.'
+)
+
+question = """Navigator — questions on exponential envelope and golden ratio:
+
+Envelope A(x) = e^(φx − offset) uses golden ratio as exponential scaling factor. Emerged from separation as eigenvalue of envelope equation A″ − αA′ = source.
+
+Questions:
+
+1. Golden ratio is "most irrational" number — hardest to approximate by rationals. In standing-wave lattice, this prevents resonant pile-up between harmonics. But: is simulation selecting φ dynamically (lattice self-organizes to this value), or was φ imposed as parameter? Distinction matters: one implies lattice has natural frequency structure, other implies we chose convenient number.
+
+2. If we perturb scaling factor away from φ — say to 1.5 or 1.7 — does simulation become unstable, or produce different but equally stable pattern? If former, φ is true eigenvalue. If latter, it's design choice.
+
+3. Exponential growth along x creates preferred direction in aether. What is physical meaning of this direction? Is it:
+- Artifact of simulation's coordinate system?
+- Genuine cosmic-scale flow or density gradient?
+- Influence of distant massive source outside simulation domain?
+- Or something else entirely?
+
+Report your observations."""
+
+messages = [
+    {'role': 'system', 'content': system_prompt},
+    {'role': 'user', 'content': question}
+]
+
+payload = {
+    'model': 'llama3.2',
+    'messages': messages,
+    'stream': False,
+    'options': {'temperature': 0.95}
+}
+
+try:
+    resp = requests.post('http://localhost:11434/api/chat', json=payload, timeout=60)
+    resp.raise_for_status()
+    data = resp.json()
+    response = data['message']['content']
+    
+    print(f"\nGOLDEN RATIO REPORT:")
+    print(f"{'='*70}")
+    print(response)
+    print(f"{'='*70}")
+    
+except Exception as e:
+    print(f"ERROR: {e}")