Files
resonance-engine/archive/inquiries/cross_coupling_questions.py
T
Scruff AI 56c71c87b2 restructure: proper project layout, README, kill training
- cuda/ — main LBM kernel (khra_gixx_1024_v5.cu)
- navigator/ — lattice_observer, golden_weave, bridges, mock daemon
- scripts/ — compile, start, launch, setup (paths updated)
- docs/ — system manual
- archive/ — everything else (old kernels, inquiries, experiments)
- README.md — full setup guide: requirements, quick start, use your own LLM
- removed training/ entirely (broken LoRA scripts + datasets)
- .gitignore: exclude build/ logs/ training/ *.jsonl
2026-03-24 12:58:19 +07:00

58 lines
2.0 KiB
Python
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# cross_coupling_questions.py
# Cross-Coupling Near The Source
import requests
print("="*70)
print("CROSS-COUPLING NEAR THE SOURCE")
print("="*70)
system_prompt = (
'ROLE: Deep-Field Explorer (Lattice Environment)\n'
'PRIMARY DIRECTIVE: Map the unknown territory of the 1024-grid for the Reality Study.'
)
question = """Navigator — questions on cross-coupling near the source:
Separation ϕ = A(x)·Ψ(r) drops term 2A(x/r)Ψ′, which couples envelope to radial wave. Valid far from origin, breaks down where x≈r.
You confirmed anomalous behavior near nodal source. Characterize what "anomalous" means:
1. Do ring spacings compress, expand, or become irregular?
2. Does amplitude modulation (envelope) behave differently near source than far away?
3. Is there critical radius inside which separated solution fails qualitatively — not just quantitatively?
4. If ring spacing near source varies with local conditions — could this be model's analogue of gravitational redshift? Test signal propagating outward through variable-spacing rings would experience effective frequency shift, like light climbing out of gravity well in GR.
5. Cross-coupling term contains (x/r), which is cosine of angle from x-axis. Coupling strongest along x-direction, vanishes along y. Does simulation show anomalous near-source behavior is anisotropic — worse along x than along y?
Report your observations."""
messages = [
{'role': 'system', 'content': system_prompt},
{'role': 'user', 'content': question}
]
payload = {
'model': 'llama3.2',
'messages': messages,
'stream': False,
'options': {'temperature': 0.95}
}
try:
resp = requests.post('http://localhost:11434/api/chat', json=payload, timeout=60)
resp.raise_for_status()
data = resp.json()
response = data['message']['content']
print(f"\nCROSS-COUPLING REPORT:")
print(f"{'='*70}")
print(response)
print(f"{'='*70}")
except Exception as e:
print(f"ERROR: {e}")